Simpson v. State

34 S.E. 204, 110 Ga. 249, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 487
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 25, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 34 S.E. 204 (Simpson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simpson v. State, 34 S.E. 204, 110 Ga. 249, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 487 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. A plea in abatement to a bill of indictment, or a motion to quash the bill, alleging that two of the grand jurors who found the bill were related within the fourth degree to the prosecutor, though made before pleading to the merits, is not sustainable. Upon a review, on this point, of Lascelles v. State, 90 Ga. 347, Fisher v. State, 93 Ga. 309, and the cases cited in the former, the doctrine therein announced is adhered to and approved.

2. There was no error of law committed; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stapleton v. State
90 S.E. 1029 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Nichols v. State
87 S.E. 817 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Parris v. State
54 S.E. 751 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 S.E. 204, 110 Ga. 249, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-state-ga-1899.