Simpson v. State
This text of 617 So. 2d 749 (Simpson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner Vaughn R. Simpson was convicted of attempted armed robbery, attempted first degree murder, and use of a firearm during the commission of a felony.1 Petitioner filed a motion for postconviction relief alleging grounds of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.2 The trial court denied petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief noting that claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must be raised by petition for writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court which considered the appeal. The trial court was correct. Ragan v. Dugger, 544 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Petitioner took an appeal from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motion. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Finding no merit in petitioner’s claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, we deny the petition.
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 So. 2d 749, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4415, 1993 WL 107055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.