Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Simpson v. State

Simpson v. State

575 So. 2d 279, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1737, 1991 WL 27159
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1991
DocketNo. 90-2301
StatusPublished

This text of 575 So. 2d 279 (Simpson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simpson v. State, 575 So. 2d 279, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1737, 1991 WL 27159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Appellant/defendant, Vaughn R. Simpson, appeals a guideline departure sentence imposed by the trial court on resen-tencing. We affirm the sentence, finding the argument raised in appellant’s brief to be without merit. We remand, however, for the trial court to correct the written sentence to specifically set out the amount of credit for time served to be allowed the defendant. Section 921.161(1), F.S.; Marshall v. State, 310 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. State
310 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 So. 2d 279, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1737, 1991 WL 27159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.