Simpson v. State

176 So. 515, 129 Fla. 127, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1078
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 15, 1937·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS and Mr. Justice DAVIS and Mr. Justice TERRELL are of the opinion that the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County should be reversed; while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the *Page 128 members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the said judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simpson v. State, 176 So. 515, 129 Fla. 127, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1078 (Fla. 1937).

176 So. 515 (Simpson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gayden v. State
80 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
City of Hollywood v. Bair
186 So. 818 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)