Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
This text of 711 So. 2d 221 (Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree that the record supports the court’s determination as to the amount of attorney’s fees and costs, and we affirm that portion of the judgment. Quality Engineered Installation, Inc. v. Higley South, Inc. 670 So.2d 929 (Fla.1996), however, requires that prejudgment interest be awarded. Because the amount involved will be so small in this case, we hope the parties can agree as to the appropriate dates so a further hearing before the circuit judge will not be required.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
711 So. 2d 221, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 1998 WL 256697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-fladistctapp-1998.