Simpson v. Sinha

246 A.D.2d 361, 666 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 222
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered December 3, 1996, which denied plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer for failure to comply with prior court orders directing him to produce certain discovery and to appear for a deposition, where defendant partially complied with the outstanding discovery requests prior to submission of plaintiff’s motion and substan[362]*362tially complied with outstanding discovery requests while the motion was pending (see, Ungar v Lesser, 152 ÁD2d 510). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simpson v. Sinha, 246 A.D.2d 361, 666 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 222 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 361 (Simpson v. Sinha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCrae v. City of New York
62 A.D.3d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Zouev v. City of New York
32 A.D.3d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pascarelli v. City of New York
16 A.D.3d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)