Simpson v. Sinha
This text of 246 A.D.2d 361 (Simpson v. Sinha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered December 3, 1996, which denied plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer for failure to comply with prior court orders directing him to produce certain discovery and to appear for a deposition, where defendant partially complied with the outstanding discovery requests prior to submission of plaintiff’s motion and substan[362]*362tially complied with outstanding discovery requests while the motion was pending (see, Ungar v Lesser, 152 ÁD2d 510). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D.2d 361, 666 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-sinha-nyappdiv-1998.