Simpson v. Simpson

75 S.E. 98, 138 Ga. 204, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 258
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 75 S.E. 98 (Simpson v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simpson v. Simpson, 75 S.E. 98, 138 Ga. 204, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 258 (Ga. 1912).

Opinion

Beck, J.

On November 15, 1911, the trial judge heard the application of the defendant in error for temporary alimony, and on December 8, 1911, rendered judgment allowing a specified amount as temporáry alimony and another amount as attorney’s fees for counsel representing the applicant. Thereupon the plaintiff in error sued out a bill of exceptions complaining of this judgment. The bill of exceptions was certified on the 20th day of December, 1911. The evidence is not embodied in the bill of exceptions, but an approved brief of the same is specified as a part of the record. It appears that.this brief of the evidence was not approved until the 5th day of January, 1912. Eeld, that the brief of evidence can not be considered by this court. The trial judge was without authority to approve the brief of evidence after the bill of exceptions had been certified. His authority to deal with the brief of evidence in any way, either by changing it or making endorsements thereon, terminated when he signed the certificate to the bill of exceptions. Milton v. City of Savannah, 121 Ga. 89 (48 S. E. 684), and cases cited. And as the only questions raised by the assignments of error are dependent for determination upon the brief of the evidence, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fernandez v. Sams
139 S.E.2d 307 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Cobb v. DeLong
120 S.E.2d 177 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Hall v. MacOn, Dublin Savannah Railroad Company
43 S.E.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Pryor v. Pryor
132 S.E. 895 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Julian v. Baker
118 S.E. 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Boatright v. Boatright
102 S.E. 424 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 S.E. 98, 138 Ga. 204, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-simpson-ga-1912.