Simpson v. Simpson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Simpson v. Simpson

550 So. 2d 153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2465, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5857, 1989 WL 122630

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 19, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2339

StatusPublished

This text of 550 So. 2d 153 (Simpson v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simpson v. Simpson, 550 So. 2d 153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2465, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5857, 1989 WL 122630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This matter was filed with this court as an appeal from a non-final order. We treat it as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny it. Petitioner seeks to have us reverse an order denying a limited lifting of a [154]*154stay order. He wants the stay order lifted only so the trial judge can order a lis pendens dissolved. The lis pendens apparently is ineffectual now because the statutory one-year period passed without any court-ordered extension. See § 48.23(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). Thus there is no need for the lifting of the stay. Should a cloud on the title now exist appellant can have it removed by separate proceedings.

PETITION DENIED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This matter was filed with this court as an appeal from a non-final order. We treat it as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny it. Petitioner seeks to have us reverse an order denying a limited lifting of a [154]*154stay order. He wants the stay order lifted only so the trial judge can order a lis pendens dissolved. The lis pendens apparently is ineffectual now because the statutory one-year period passed without any court-ordered extension. See § 48.23(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). Thus there is no need for the lifting of the stay. Should a cloud on the title now exist appellant can have it removed by separate proceedings.

PETITION DENIED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 So. 2d 153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2465, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5857, 1989 WL 122630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-simpson-fladistctapp-1989.