Simpson v. Rhode Island Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Simpson v. Rhode Island Company

58 A. 658, 26 R.I. 200, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 49

DecidedJune 4, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A. 658 (Simpson v. Rhode Island Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simpson v. Rhode Island Company, 58 A. 658, 26 R.I. 200, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 49 (R.I. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action given by section 14 of chapter 233 of the General Laws is to re-imburse the husband, or widow and children, or the next of kin, of a person who has been killed by the tprt of another, for the pecuniary loss occasioned by such death.

This action is brought by a widow for the loss of a husband who was of unsound mind and required constant supervision. The declaration does not set out any peculiar circumstances which show any substantial pecuniary loss from this death. Negligence is alleged on the part of the defendant’s servants, but it is not clearly stated in what that negligence consisted. In approaching a person on the track, of full age and apparently possessed.of his faculties, the motorman would be required to .take such precautions only as if the person were (1) actually of sound mind. But the demurrer is based only upon *201 the ground that the declaration shows contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The only fact from which this might be inferred is that the insane person was at large. This' does not necessarily show negligence on the part of his custodian. Nellis Street R. R. Accident Law, 413.

Leon L. Mott, for plaintiff. Henry W. Hayes, Frank T. Easton, Lefferts S. Hoffman, for defendant.

The demurrer must be overruled and the case remanded to the Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The action given by section 14 of chapter 233 of the General Laws is to re-imburse the husband, or widow and children, or the next of kin, of a person who has been killed by the tprt of another, for the pecuniary loss occasioned by such death.

This action is brought by a widow for the loss of a husband who was of unsound mind and required constant supervision. The declaration does not set out any peculiar circumstances which show any substantial pecuniary loss from this death. Negligence is alleged on the part of the defendant’s servants, but it is not clearly stated in what that negligence consisted. In approaching a person on the track, of full age and apparently possessed.of his faculties, the motorman would be required to .take such precautions only as if the person were (1) actually of sound mind. But the demurrer is based only upon *201 the ground that the declaration shows contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The only fact from which this might be inferred is that the insane person was at large. This' does not necessarily show negligence on the part of his custodian. Nellis Street R. R. Accident Law, 413.

Leon L. Mott, for plaintiff. Henry W. Hayes, Frank T. Easton, Lefferts S. Hoffman, for defendant.

The demurrer must be overruled and the case remanded to the Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A. 658, 26 R.I. 200, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-rhode-island-company-ri-1904.