Simpson v. Patti

248 So. 2d 175, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6471
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 1971
DocketNo. O-50
StatusPublished

This text of 248 So. 2d 175 (Simpson v. Patti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simpson v. Patti, 248 So. 2d 175, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Kerivan v. Fogal (1945), 156 Fla. 92, 22 So.2d 584; Hendricks v. Stark (1930), 99 Fla. 277, 126 So. 293, 297; Rosenthal v. LeMay (Fla.1954) 72 So.2d 289.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenthal v. Le May
72 So. 2d 289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Hendricks v. Stark
126 So. 293 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Kerivan v. Fogal
22 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 So. 2d 175, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-patti-fladistctapp-1971.