Simpson v. Patti

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Simpson v. Patti

248 So. 2d 175, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6471

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1971·No. No. O-50·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Kerivan v. Fogal (1945), 156 Fla. 92, 22 So.2d 584; Hendricks v. Stark (1930), 99 Fla. 277, 126 So. 293, 297; Rosenthal v. LeMay (Fla.1954) 72 So.2d 289.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Kerivan v. Fogal (1945), 156 Fla. 92, 22 So.2d 584; Hendricks v. Stark (1930), 99 Fla. 277, 126 So. 293, 297; Rosenthal v. LeMay (Fla.1954) 72 So.2d 289.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Simpson v. Patti, 248 So. 2d 175, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

248 So. 2d 175 (Simpson v. Patti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related