Simpson v. Patten
4 Johns. 422
Opinion
A promise to pay the debt of a third person must be in writing, notwithstanding it is made on a sufficient consideration, (2 Str. 873. 2 Term Rep. 80. 2 Wils. 94. 1 Saund. 211. n. 2.) The judgment below must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simpson v. Patten, 4 Johns. 422 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
4 Johns. 422 (Simpson v. Patten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Awotin v. Healy
9 N.E.2d 640 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1937)
Gump v. Halberstadt
15 P. 467 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)
Robinson v. Gilman
43 N.H. 485 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1862)
Mallory v. . Gillett
21 N.Y. 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1860)
Mallory v. Gillett
23 Barb. 610 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Eddy v. Roberts
17 Ill. 505 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1856)
Westheimer v. Peacock
2 Iowa 528 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1856)
Emerick v. Sanders
1 Wis. 77 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1853)
Barker v. Bucklin
2 Denio 45 (New York Supreme Court, 1846)
Shaw v. Thompson
21 F. Cas. 1201 (S.D. New York, 1845)