Simpson v. National Archives & Record Administration

Missouri Court of Appeals

Simpson v. National Archives & Record Administration

367 S.W.3d 651, 2012 WL 2004522, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 756

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2012·No. No. ED 97297·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Markeisha Simpson appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying unemployment benefits after she was discharged from the National Archives and Record Administration (Employer). On appeal, Simpson argued that Commission erred in finding that she had been discharged for misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record [652] on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Markeisha Simpson appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying unemployment benefits after she was discharged from the National Archives and Record Administration (Employer). On appeal, Simpson argued that Commission erred in finding that she had been discharged for misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record [652] on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Simpson v. National Archives & Record Administration, 367 S.W.3d 651, 2012 WL 2004522, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 651 (Simpson v. National Archives & Record Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.