Simpson v. Johnson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION
NORMAN SIMPSON, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:22-cv-15 V. JAVAKA JOHNSON, MARQUETTE SISTRUNK, ANISHA MAJETTE, KORBIN TIPPETT, and WYLENE HUNTER, Defendants.
ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation for the Court to deny Defendant Hunter’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Doc. 84. Defendant Hunter did not file Objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has elapsed. Accordingly, upon review, I find no clear error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and ADOPT the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (If no specific objections are made or no objections are made at all, “the appropriate standard of review for the report and recommendation is clear error.”). I DENY Defendant Hunter’s Motion for Summary Judgment. SO ORDERED, this _/7" day of March, 2025.
/ tooo AHHH ZZ HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL UNITED SITATES DISTRICT COURT “N__ SOUTHER N DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simpson v. Johnson (Simpson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.