Simpson v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Simpson v. Johnson

385 F. App'x 349

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2010·No. No. 09-7905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John David Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simpson v. Johnson, No. 3:05-cv-00876-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2008; Aug. 6, 2009; Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[350]*350fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John David Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simpson v. Johnson, No. 3:05-cv-00876-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2008; Aug. 6, 2009; Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[350]*350fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Simpson v. Johnson, 385 F. App'x 349 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

385 F. App'x 349 (Simpson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related