Simpson v. Hillford

1 Del. Cas. 494
CourtDelaware Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJuly 15, 1796
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 494 (Simpson v. Hillford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simpson v. Hillford, 1 Del. Cas. 494 (Del. Super. Ct. 1796).

Opinion

Bassett, C. J.

The Court have attentively heard the argument, and it is beyond all doubt that at the time of passing the Act for the more easy and speedy recovery of legacies the legislature well knew a legacy could not be recovered at common law. There were then two gentlemen in the House whose legal abilities have never been questioned, one of whom must have penned this Act. (The persons here alluded to were the two Chief Justices of Pennsylvania and Delaware — Hon. Thomas McKean and Hon. George Read, Esquires.) The plaintiff cannot sue at common law without an express promise, and he has not pursued the method prescribed by the Act.

Enter the nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-hillford-delctcompl-1796.