Simpson v. Gafney

30 A. 1120, 66 N.H. 477
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1891·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

The plaintiff may become nonsuit at any time before trial. Webster v. Bridgewater, 63 N. H. 296; Farr v. Cate, 58 N. H. 367; Fulford v. Converse, 54 N. H. 543; Wright v. Bartlett, 45 N. H. 289; Judge of Probate v. Abbot, 13 N. H. 21. The executor having taken the appeal might abandon it by neglecting to give notice to the creditor. G. L., c. 200, s. 3 ; Varrell v. Varrell, 57 N. H. 208. The obligation of the creditor to enter and prosecute his claim to judgment (G. L., c. 200, ss. 5, 7) is avoided by the abandonment of the appeal by the party taking the same. The appellant, for the purpose of maintaining his appeal, is in the same position as the plaintiff in a civil suit, and may abandon the same at any time before a trial is entered upon. Doughty v. Little, 61 N. H. 365. That there had been a trial and a verdict which had been set aside is immaterial, because, after a verdict rendered and set aside, the same rules and remedy apply as if the cause had never been -tried. Wright v. Bartlett, supra. The appeal being dismissed upon motion of the appellant, that is, abandoned by him, the allowance by the commissioner and the decree of the probate court accepting his report are unaffected, and stand as if no appeal.had been taken. G. L., c. 207, s. 12.

Exception overruled.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simpson v. Gafney, 30 A. 1120, 66 N.H. 477 (N.H. 1891).

30 A. 1120 (Simpson v. Gafney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alwyn v. Duval
26 F. App'x 17 (First Circuit, 2001)
Town of Plaistow v. Riddle
681 A.2d 650 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1996)
Appeal of Nolan
599 A.2d 112 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1991)
Ingalls v. Maine Central Railroad
142 A. 695 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1928)
Hood v. Marshall
45 A. 574 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1899)