Simpson v. ESTATE OF NORTON
This text of 984 So. 2d 577 (Simpson v. ESTATE OF NORTON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dorothy Collins SIMPSON, Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF Roosevelt NORTON, Tangela Norton Ilas, and Cedric Norton, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dorothy Collins Simpson, in proper person.
Leon E. Sharpe, Miami, for appellees.
Before COPE, WELLS, and LAGOA, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of a final order in a probate proceeding. The facts of the case and a number of legal issues were addressed in an earlier opinion of this Court, Simpson v. Estate of Norton, 949 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The trial court's rulings were entered after an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that the rulings are supported by competent substantial evidence. The appellant has failed to demonstrate the existence of any error of law or abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
984 So. 2d 577, 2008 WL 2185327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-estate-of-norton-fladistctapp-2008.