Simpson v. ESTATE OF NORTON

984 So. 2d 577, 2008 WL 2185327
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 2008·No. 3D07-2588·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

984 So.2d 577 (2008)

Dorothy Collins SIMPSON, Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF Roosevelt NORTON, Tangela Norton Ilas, and Cedric Norton, Appellees.

No. 3D07-2588.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 28, 2008.
Rehearing Denied June 27, 2008.

Dorothy Collins Simpson, in proper person.

Leon E. Sharpe, Miami, for appellees.

Before COPE, WELLS, and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a final order in a probate proceeding. The facts of the case and a number of legal issues were addressed in an earlier opinion of this Court, Simpson v. Estate of Norton, 949 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The trial court's rulings were entered after an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that the rulings are supported by competent substantial evidence. The appellant has failed to demonstrate the existence of any error of law or abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simpson v. ESTATE OF NORTON, 984 So. 2d 577, 2008 WL 2185327 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

984 So. 2d 577 (Simpson v. ESTATE OF NORTON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gomez v. State
984 So. 2d 577 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)