Simpson v. Cohen

252 A.D. 275, 299 N.Y.S. 124
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 1937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was held in Matter of Independent Nominations (186 N. Y. 266) that single petitions might nominate candidates running in different political units. In our opinion the amendment to section 137 of the Election Law (Laws of 1935, chap. 955) effects no change in this rule. The requirement included in the law by that amendment, that petitions be consecutively numbered, seems to have been sufficiently complied with here.

Assuming that the requirement for consecutive numbering is mandatory, in the greater number of Assembly districts there was consecutive numbering of all petitions within that unit. These signatures aggregated many thousands beyond the required numbers.

The orders should be affirmed.

Present — Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

In Trades Union Party ” proceeding: Order unanimously affirmed.

In “ Anti-Communist Party ” proceeding: Order unanimously affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simpson v. Cohen, 252 A.D. 275, 299 N.Y.S. 124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 275 (Simpson v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Popkin v. Umane
22 A.D.3d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Contessa v. McCarthy
54 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Pavis v. Heffernan
185 Misc. 626 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)