Simpson v. Bank of Arlington
112 S.E. 895, 153 Ga. 600, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 128
Opinion
On a preliminary bearing the judge, under the evidence submitted, did not abuse his discretion in maintaining the status quo by directing the fund in controversy to be placed in bank as a special deposit to await the further order of the court, and in refusing an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simpson v. Bank of Arlington, 112 S.E. 895, 153 Ga. 600, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 128 (Ga. 1922).
112 S.E. 895 (Simpson v. Bank of Arlington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.