Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Everlast Lighting, Inc.

W.D. Michigan

Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Everlast Lighting, Inc.

DecidedAugust 12, 2024

Docket1:23-cv-00886

StatusUnknown

This text of Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Everlast Lighting, Inc. (Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Everlast Lighting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Everlast Lighting, Inc., (W.D. Mich. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SIMPLY BRIGHT IDEAS, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 1:23-cv-886 v. ) ) Honorable Paul L. Maloney EVERLAST LIGHTING, INC., ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE CASE

On August 21, 2023, Simply Bright Ideas, Inc., Plaintiff, filed a complaint against Everlast Lighting, Inc, Defendant. (ECF No. 1). Defendant moved to dismiss (ECF No. 7), and Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11). The court dismissed as moot Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 12). Defendant filed an answer to Plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 13). On December 1, 2023, the court issued a case management order. (ECF No. 19). On January 31, 2024, the parties selected a facilitative mediator. (ECF No. 21). No mediation was held. The court ordered the parties to file a joint status report. (ECF No. 27). Each party filed a separate status report. (ECF Nos. 28, 29). Defendant’s status report indicates that Defendant “closed its doors on June 5, 2024 and no longer operates or has any employees.” (ECF No. 28 at PID 335). Plaintiff’s status report suggests that “discovery and further action in this matter be put on hold for 30-45 days for the parties to implement a negotiated resolution.” (ECF No. 29 at PID 338). “Administrative closures are a tool of docket management.” , 62 F.4th 270, 274 (6th Cir. 2023). “Existing outside the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, administrative closures primarily serve as a method ‘to shelve pending, but

dormant, cases.’” (quoting , 166 F.3d 389, 392 (1st Cir. 1999)). A court decision to administratively close a case does not constitute a “final judgment.” , 200 F. App’x 419, 422 (6th Cir. 2006). The court has reviewed the parties’ status reports. The court will administratively

close this case. This is not a decision on the merits, and this order does not dispose of this action. Either party may reference this order, file a motion, and reopen this action when appropriate. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is administratively closed.

Date: August 12, 2024 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SIMPLY BRIGHT IDEAS, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 1:23-cv-886 v. ) ) Honorable Paul L. Maloney EVERLAST LIGHTING, INC., ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE CASE

On August 21, 2023, Simply Bright Ideas, Inc., Plaintiff, filed a complaint against Everlast Lighting, Inc, Defendant. (ECF No. 1). Defendant moved to dismiss (ECF No. 7), and Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11). The court dismissed as moot Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 12). Defendant filed an answer to Plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 13). On December 1, 2023, the court issued a case management order. (ECF No. 19). On January 31, 2024, the parties selected a facilitative mediator. (ECF No. 21). No mediation was held. The court ordered the parties to file a joint status report. (ECF No. 27). Each party filed a separate status report. (ECF Nos. 28, 29). Defendant’s status report indicates that Defendant “closed its doors on June 5, 2024 and no longer operates or has any employees.” (ECF No. 28 at PID 335). Plaintiff’s status report suggests that “discovery and further action in this matter be put on hold for 30-45 days for the parties to implement a negotiated resolution.” (ECF No. 29 at PID 338). “Administrative closures are a tool of docket management.” , 62 F.4th 270, 274 (6th Cir. 2023). “Existing outside the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, administrative closures primarily serve as a method ‘to shelve pending, but

dormant, cases.’” (quoting , 166 F.3d 389, 392 (1st Cir. 1999)). A court decision to administratively close a case does not constitute a “final judgment.” , 200 F. App’x 419, 422 (6th Cir. 2006). The court has reviewed the parties’ status reports. The court will administratively

close this case. This is not a decision on the merits, and this order does not dispose of this action. Either party may reference this order, file a motion, and reopen this action when appropriate. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is administratively closed.

Date: August 12, 2024 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Everlast Lighting, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simply-bright-ideas-inc-v-everlast-lighting-inc-miwd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack