Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co.
This text of Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co. (Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SIMPLE DESIGN LTD., Case No. 19-cv-05501-VC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR Vv. ALTERNATIVE SERVICE CANDYMOBI INFORMATION Re: Dkt. No. 11 TECHNOLOGY CO., et al., Defendants.
Simple Design’s ex parte motion for service by email is granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3). See Rio Properties, Inc. vy. Rio International Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007, 1015 (9th Cir. 2002). Service by email here is notice reasonably calculated to provide actual notice to the defendants, and it will not violate any international agreement because the Hague Convention does not apply where the address of the defendants is not known. See Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents, Article 1, Nov. 15, 1965, 20 U.S.T. 361, 1969 WL 97765.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2019 = VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simple-design-ltd-v-candymobi-information-technology-co-cand-2019.