Simpkinson v. Neumuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Simpkinson v. Neumuller

252 A.D. 625, 300 N.Y.S. 739, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5746

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 625 (Simpkinson v. Neumuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simpkinson v. Neumuller, 252 A.D. 625, 300 N.Y.S. 739, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cuelam.

Upon the admitted allegations of the complaint, the court was authorized to direct summary judgment for plaintiff and an assessment of damages. The learned referee correctly decided that it was defendant’s obligation to provide his daughter, during her minority, with necessaries suitable to her condition, and to be measured by his pecuniary circumstances. (DeBrauwere v. DeBrauwere, 203 N. Y. 460, 464; Laumeier v. Laumeier, 237 id. 357, 364.) We believe, however, that the amount assessed should be limited to the sum of $2,197.72, which represents moneys actually expended for support and education of the infant during [626]*626the period in question. To this sum must be added $479.47 for costs and disbursements heretofore taxed.

The order and judgment should be accordingly modified by reducing the amount of the judgment to the sum of $2,677.19, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present — Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ,

Judgment and order unanimously modified by reducing the amount of the judgment to the sum of $2,677.19, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cuelam.

Upon the admitted allegations of the complaint, the court was authorized to direct summary judgment for plaintiff and an assessment of damages. The learned referee correctly decided that it was defendant’s obligation to provide his daughter, during her minority, with necessaries suitable to her condition, and to be measured by his pecuniary circumstances. (DeBrauwere v. DeBrauwere, 203 N. Y. 460, 464; Laumeier v. Laumeier, 237 id. 357, 364.) We believe, however, that the amount assessed should be limited to the sum of $2,197.72, which represents moneys actually expended for support and education of the infant during [626]*626the period in question. To this sum must be added $479.47 for costs and disbursements heretofore taxed.

The order and judgment should be accordingly modified by reducing the amount of the judgment to the sum of $2,677.19, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present — Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ,

Judgment and order unanimously modified by reducing the amount of the judgment to the sum of $2,677.19, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 625, 300 N.Y.S. 739, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpkinson-v-neumuller-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack