Simonton v. Boucher
22 F. Cas. 167, 2 Wash. C. C. 473
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided January 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
BY
The award cannot be read, either as prima facie, or as conclusive evidence in this action. But evidence of the confessions of Boucher may be given.
THE COURT also decided that entries made by Simonton or Boucher, made in the partnership books after the dissolution, might be given in evidence against the party who made them, but not otherwise.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simonton v. Boucher, 22 F. Cas. 167, 2 Wash. C. C. 473 (circtdpa 1811).
22 F. Cas. 167 (Simonton v. Boucher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montgomery v. Dillingham
3 Miss. 647 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1844)