Simonson v. Gordon

Indiana Supreme Court

Simonson v. Gordon

51 Ind. 580

DecidedNovember 15, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 51 Ind. 580 (Simonson v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simonson v. Gordon, 51 Ind. 580 (Ind. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Worden, J.

Suit by the appellees against the appellants and Nathaniel Leonard and Robert Mitchell, upon certain [581]*581promissory, notes. Leonard and Mitchell made default. Simonson and Longnecker answered. Trial by the court, finding and j udgment for the plaintiffs. Simonson and Longnecker alone appeal, the other defendants below declining to join therein.

The only point made is, that the finding was not sustained by the evidence.

Upon an examination of the evidence, we are satisfied with the finding. The evidence, taken together, does not establish any defence to the notes sued upon.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

Suit by the appellees against the appellants and Nathaniel Leonard and Robert Mitchell, upon certain [581]*581promissory, notes. Leonard and Mitchell made default. Simonson and Longnecker answered. Trial by the court, finding and j udgment for the plaintiffs. Simonson and Longnecker alone appeal, the other defendants below declining to join therein.

The only point made is, that the finding was not sustained by the evidence.

Upon an examination of the evidence, we are satisfied with the finding. The evidence, taken together, does not establish any defence to the notes sued upon.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Ind. 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simonson-v-gordon-ind-1875.