Simons v. Southern Home Insurance
This text of 203 N.C. 146 (Simons v. Southern Home Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No copy of the insurance policy was attached to the complaint, and there is no allegation tending to show the relationship of the plaintiffs to the cause of action or that they are the real parties in interest. The plaintiff, Henry Simons, sues as administrator of Bettie A. Simons. It does not appear that he was ever qualified as administrator or what connection Bettie A. Simons had with the case. Moreover, causes of action to reform an insurance contract and recover thereon is joined with allegations of slander and careless business methods.
An inspection of the complaint warrants the judgment sustaining the demurrer.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 N.C. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simons-v-southern-home-insurance-nc-1932.