Simonetti v. Vasquez
This text of Simonetti v. Vasquez (Simonetti v. Vasquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Marisa Simonetti, and Marisa for Civ. No. 25-3390 (JWB/DLM) Minnesota,
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Jacklyn Vasquez, Hennepin County, the OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE City of Edina, and all Edina Police Officers involved in Case No. 27-CR-24-14103,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on September 17, 2025. (Doc. No. 8.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The September 17, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 8) is ACCEPTED and this action is REMANDED to the State of Minnesota District Court in Hennepin County. 2. The motion to extend time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED AS MOOT. Date: October 6, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell_______ JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Simonetti v. Vasquez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simonetti-v-vasquez-mnd-2025.