Simonelli v. Simonelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Simonelli v. Simonelli

151 A.D.2d 978, 542 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 151 A.D.2d 978 (Simonelli v. Simonelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simonelli v. Simonelli, 151 A.D.2d 978, 542 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In view of the relatively short duration of the marriage, the relatively small amount of contributions to their respective pension funds that the parties made during the marriage, and particularly because defendant will presumably retire long before plaintiff, we believe that a more equitable distribution would result from deleting that portion of the judgment awarding each party an interest in the pension rights of the other. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Lynch, J.— equitable distribution.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In view of the relatively short duration of the marriage, the relatively small amount of contributions to their respective pension funds that the parties made during the marriage, and particularly because defendant will presumably retire long before plaintiff, we believe that a more equitable distribution would result from deleting that portion of the judgment awarding each party an interest in the pension rights of the other. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Lynch, J.— equitable distribution.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 A.D.2d 978, 542 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simonelli-v-simonelli-nyappdiv-1989.