Simone v. Apex Mortgage

76 F. App'x 441
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 29, 2003·No. No. 02-3274·Published

Opinion

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Court.

Debtor Richard Simone has appealed the August 9, 2002, judgment by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s vacation of the automatic stay.

Because the facts of this dispute are well known to the parties, we will not repeat them except for a few key ones. On March 31, 1999, Simone and his wife, Patricia, borrowed $276,000 from Apex Mortgage Corporation. The Note was secured by a first mortgage on Simone’s apartment building in North Hanover, New Jersey. In November 1999, Simone defaulted on repayment of the loan. Ultimately, Simone filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, triggering the automatic stay. The automatic stay was conditionally lifted but, when Simone failed to meet those conditions, his property was sold at auction. Simone appealed the Bankruptcy Court’s order to vacate the automatic stay to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court. Simone then appealed to this Court.

Because the property has already been sold, the question whether the automatic stay was properly granted is moot and no relief is available to Simone. This case must therefore be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir.1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simone v. Apex Mortgage, 76 F. App'x 441 (3d Cir. 2003).

76 F. App'x 441 (Simone v. Apex Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
975 F.2d 964 (Third Circuit, 1992)