Simone v. Apex Mortgage
This text of 76 F. App'x 441 (Simone v. Apex Mortgage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Debtor Richard Simone has appealed the August 9, 2002, judgment by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s vacation of the automatic stay.
Because the facts of this dispute are well known to the parties, we will not repeat them except for a few key ones. On March 31, 1999, Simone and his wife, Patricia, borrowed $276,000 from Apex Mortgage Corporation. The Note was secured by a first mortgage on Simone’s apartment building in North Hanover, New Jersey. In November 1999, Simone defaulted on repayment of the loan. Ultimately, Simone filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, triggering the automatic stay. The automatic stay was conditionally lifted but, when Simone failed to meet those conditions, his property was sold at auction. Simone appealed the Bankruptcy Court’s order to vacate the automatic stay to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court. Simone then appealed to this Court.
Because the property has already been sold, the question whether the automatic stay was properly granted is moot and no relief is available to Simone. This case must therefore be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir.1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 F. App'x 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simone-v-apex-mortgage-ca3-2003.