Simonds v. Buford

18 Ind. 176
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A notice of intention to hold a lien for materials furnished, would appear to be sufficient, when it states the amount, to whom,-by whom, and for what due, and the premises upon which the lien is contemplated.

"Where materials were furnished to an unmarried man, and proceedings are instituted after his death without issue, in the absence of any grant of administration, his heirs were prop[177] erly made defendants. The judgment is reversed, with costs, and cause remanded.

Andrew H. Evans and John H. Gould, for appellants. L. Chamberlain, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simonds v. Buford, 18 Ind. 176 (Ind. 1862).

18 Ind. 176 (Simonds v. Buford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bulldog Concrete Forms Sales Corp. v. Taylor
195 F.2d 417 (Seventh Circuit, 1952)
Windfall Natural Gas, Mining & Oil Co. v. Roe
84 N.E. 996 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Krotz v. A. R. Beck Lumber Co.
73 N.E. 273 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Rhodes v. Webb-Jameson Co.
49 N.E. 283 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Coburn v. Stephens
36 N.E. 132 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Hall v. Bunte
20 Ind. 304 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1863)