Simon Velasquez Cansinos v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 669 F. App'x 328 (Simon Velasquez Cansinos v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Guatemalan citizen Simon Velasquez-Cansinos petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s denial of his application for withholding of removal. After careful consideration, we conclude that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the agency’s determination that Velasquez-Cansinos failed to establish a clear probability of persecution in Guatemala due to a protected ground. See Ezeagwu v. Mukasey, 537 F.3d 836, 839 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-velasquez-cansinos-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca8-2016.