Simon v. Simon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Simon v. Simon

298 A.D.2d 515, 748 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9975

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 298 A.D.2d 515 (Simon v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simon v. Simon, 298 A.D.2d 515, 748 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 28, 1998, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated January 4, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff former wife’s postjudgment claim to enforce stated portions of the parties’ stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion based upon its finding that he failed to establish his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Cincotta v City of New York, 292 AD2d 558; Berkey v Emma, 291 AD2d 517). Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 28, 1998, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated January 4, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff former wife’s postjudgment claim to enforce stated portions of the parties’ stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion based upon its finding that he failed to establish his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Cincotta v City of New York, 292 AD2d 558; Berkey v Emma, 291 AD2d 517). Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 515, 748 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-simon-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack