Simon v. Mayer
This text of 188 Misc. 166 (Simon v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence tending to show that the landlord sought “ in good faith not to offer the room for rent ” [167]*167within the meaning of paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) oí section 6 of.the Bent Eegulation for Hotels and Booming Houses in the Hew York City Defense-Bental Area .(10 Federal Begister 324, 328). The fact that the landlord intends to occupy the space himself does not take the case out of the scope of that provision. It was error to dismiss the petition.
The final order should he reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 Misc. 166, 67 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-mayer-nyappterm-1946.