Simon v. Knipmeyer

417 So. 2d 399, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7607
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 8, 1982·No. No. 12811·Published

Opinion

BYRNES, Judge.

The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument. He did show up later during that day, but he has not filed any briefs in connection with this case. The appellee has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Delpit v. Delpit, 1957, 232 La. 539, 94 So.2d 660; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La. 824, 95 So.2d 326.

We have examined the record carefully and find no error patent on the face thereof.

[400]*400For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simon v. Knipmeyer, 417 So. 2d 399, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7607 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

417 So. 2d 399 (Simon v. Knipmeyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Succession of Bailey
95 So. 2d 326 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1957)
Perkins v. Buchler
65 So. 2d 130 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1953)
Delpit v. Delpit
94 So. 2d 660 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1957)