Simon v. Knipmeyer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Simon v. Knipmeyer

417 So. 2d 399, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7607

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 8, 1982

DocketNo. 12811

StatusPublished

This text of 417 So. 2d 399 (Simon v. Knipmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simon v. Knipmeyer, 417 So. 2d 399, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7607 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

BYRNES, Judge.

The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument. He did show up later during that day, but he has not filed any briefs in connection with this case. The appellee has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Delpit v. Delpit, 1957, 232 La. 539, 94 So.2d 660; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La. 824, 95 So.2d 326.

We have examined the record carefully and find no error patent on the face thereof.

[400]*400For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI