Simon v. Hannigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Simon v. Hannigan

214 A.D.2d 1031, 627 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 1031 (Simon v. Hannigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simon v. Hannigan, 214 A.D.2d 1031, 627 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: "A licensing officer has broad discretion in determining whether to grant, deny or revoke a pistol license (Matter of Fromson v Nelson, 178 AD2d 479; Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 AD2d 885) * * * The licensing officer’s determination will not be disturbed unless it is arbitrary and capricious (Matter of King v Ingraham, 113 AD2d 977; Matter of Davis v Clyne [58 AD2d 947])” (Matter of Eddy v Kirk, 195 AD2d 1009, 1010-1011, affd 83 NY2d 919). Respondent’s determination revoking petitioner’s pistol license did not constitute an abuse of discretion and was neither arbitrary nor capricious. (Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: "A licensing officer has broad discretion in determining whether to grant, deny or revoke a pistol license (Matter of Fromson v Nelson, 178 AD2d 479; Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 AD2d 885) * * * The licensing officer’s determination will not be disturbed unless it is arbitrary and capricious (Matter of King v Ingraham, 113 AD2d 977; Matter of Davis v Clyne [58 AD2d 947])” (Matter of Eddy v Kirk, 195 AD2d 1009, 1010-1011, affd 83 NY2d 919). Respondent’s determination revoking petitioner’s pistol license did not constitute an abuse of discretion and was neither arbitrary nor capricious. (Original Proceeding Pursuant to CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 1031, 627 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-hannigan-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack