Simon v. FrancInvest, S.A.

2020 NY Slip Op 3751, 185 A.D.3d 435, 124 N.Y.S.3d 779
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 2, 2020
Docket11766N 162867/14
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 3751 (Simon v. FrancInvest, S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simon v. FrancInvest, S.A., 2020 NY Slip Op 3751, 185 A.D.3d 435, 124 N.Y.S.3d 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Simon v FrancInvest, S.A. (2020 NY Slip Op 03751)
Simon v FrancInvest, S.A.
2020 NY Slip Op 03751
Decided on July 2, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 2, 2020
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gische, Kern, Oing, González, JJ.

11766N 162867/14

[*1] Jean-Pascal Simon, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

FrancInvest, S.A., Nominal Defendant, JJS Group, Inc., Nominal Defendant-Respondent, French-American Surgery Center, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents, Fifth Avenue Surgery Center, LLC, et al., Defendants.


Law Office of Nancy J. Volin, New York (Nancy J. Volin of counsel), for appellant.

Lebow & Sokolow LLP, New York (Mark D. Lebow of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered November 14, 2019, which denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against nominal defendants (FrancInvest and JJS), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against FrancInvest and JJS and instead setting a schedule for the service of pleadings in light of various orders concerning the complaint (see Simon v FrancInvest, S.A., 178 AD3d 436 [1st Dept 2019]). While FrancInvest and JJS are appropriate parties given that plaintiff's current remaining claims are stockholder derivative claims, they are nominal defendants against which no direct claims have been made or relief sought.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JULY 2, 2020

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Mar. & Gen. Ins. Co. v. Rockingham Ins. Co.
2025 NY Slip Op 00382 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 3751, 185 A.D.3d 435, 124 N.Y.S.3d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-francinvest-sa-nyappdiv-2020.