Simon v. Cohen
This text of 279 A.D. 603 (Simon v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our opinion the denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Boyd v. United States Mtge. & Trust Co., 187 N. Y. 262, 266, 270; Yeager v. Co-operative Fire Underwriters Assn. of N. Y. State, No. 2, 243 App. Div. 743; McKenzie v. Lavine, 249 App. Div. 755; Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 603, 107 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1951.