Simon v. Cohen
279 A.D. 603, 107 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161
Opinion
In our opinion the denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Boyd v. United States Mtge. & Trust Co., 187 N. Y. 262, 266, 270; Yeager v. Co-operative Fire Underwriters Assn. of N. Y. State, No. 2, 243 App. Div. 743; McKenzie v. Lavine, 249 App. Div. 755; Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simon v. Cohen, 279 A.D. 603, 107 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 603 (Simon v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boyd v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.
79 N.E. 999 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Yeager v. Co-operative Fire Underwriters Ass'n
243 A.D. 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
McKenzie v. Lavine
249 A.D. 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)