Simon v. Christian
This text of 65 N.W. 455 (Simon v. Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action of replevin for the recovery of the possession of diamonds. Verdict for defendant. A new trial was granted on plaintiff’s motion on the ground that the verdict was not sustained [263]*263bj the evidence. We will not attempt to recite the evidence, which is very contradictory, as it would take altogether too much space to recite sufficient of it to give any adequate idea of the weight of the evidence and circumstances on one side and the other. But we have no doubt that under the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), the order appealed from should be affirmed. So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 N.W. 455, 63 Minn. 262, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-christian-minn-1895.