Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District Council
54 F. App'x 641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District Council. Read the opinion of the Court — 316 F.3d 974 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 16, 2003·No. No. 01-55937; D.C. No. CV-98-00840-CAS·Published
Opinion
ORDER
The union’s Motion to Reconsider Deputy Clerk’s Order Granting Appellants’ Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake in Appellants’ Notice of Appeal is DENIED. The union’s Motion to Strike Appellants’ Excerpts of Record and Opening Brief, to Vacate Briefing Schedule, and for Monetary Sanctions is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District Council, 54 F. App'x 641 (9th Cir. 2003).
54 F. App'x 641 (Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.