Simms v. Simms, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)

CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 27, 1998
DocketNo. 97-P-0005.
StatusUnpublished

This text of Simms v. Simms, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998) (Simms v. Simms, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simms v. Simms, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998), (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

DOMESTIC RELATIONS/VISITATION:

An appellate court will review a trial court's decision with respect to visitation with deference and will reverse only if the trial court abused its discretion.

A nonresidential parent's imprisonment for a term of years is an extraordinary circumstance which will support the denial of visitation. It is presumed not to be in a child's best interest to visit a parent who is incarcerated The incarcerated parent bears the burden of demonstrating that visitation between the child and parent at the place of incarceration is in the child's best interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Simms v. Simms, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simms-v-simms-unpublished-decision-3-27-1998-ohioctapp-1998.