Simms v. Norwalk Housing Authority, No. 320220 (Nov. 20, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Simms v. Norwalk Housing Authority, No. 320220 (Nov. 20, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9660

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedNovember 20, 1996

DocketNo. 320220

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9660 (Simms v. Norwalk Housing Authority, No. 320220 (Nov. 20, 1996)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simms v. Norwalk Housing Authority, No. 320220 (Nov. 20, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9660 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant's motion for summary judgment (#122) is denied. In determining whether the notice required by General Statutes § 8-67 "is sufficient, the court should consider the entire communication. Stovall v. Publishers Paper Co.,284 Or. 53, 584 P.2d 1375." Zullo v. Smith, 179 Conn. 596,604 (1980). In so doing the court must consider the statement of the witness accompanying the cover letter to the defendant. Cf. Barnett v. Board of Education, 232 Conn. 198, 215 (1995). As for the defendant's claim that this latter document was not "filed with the chairman or the secretary of the authority", the defendant has not sought to satisfy its burden of proof.

Dated at Bridgeport, this 18th day of November, 1996.

Bruce L. Levin Judge of the Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant's motion for summary judgment (#122) is denied. In determining whether the notice required by General Statutes § 8-67 "is sufficient, the court should consider the entire communication. Stovall v. Publishers Paper Co.,284 Or. 53, 584 P.2d 1375." Zullo v. Smith, 179 Conn. 596,604 (1980). In so doing the court must consider the statement of the witness accompanying the cover letter to the defendant. Cf. Barnett v. Board of Education, 232 Conn. 198, 215 (1995). As for the defendant's claim that this latter document was not "filed with the chairman or the secretary of the authority", the defendant has not sought to satisfy its burden of proof.

Dated at Bridgeport, this 18th day of November, 1996.

Bruce L. Levin Judge of the Superior Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simms-v-norwalk-housing-authority-no-320220-nov-20-1996-connsuperct-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack