Simms v. Hagel

Fourth Circuit

Simms v. Hagel

641 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 21, 2016·No. No. 15-2292·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheila C. Simms appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint raising claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simms v. Hagel, No. [269]*2693:14-cv-60433-REP, 2015 WL 5020894 (E.D.Va. Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheila C. Simms appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint raising claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simms v. Hagel, No. [269]*2693:14-cv-60433-REP, 2015 WL 5020894 (E.D.Va. Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,

Simms v. Hagel, 641 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

641 F. App'x 268 (Simms v. Hagel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.