Simmons v. Vickers

502 F. App'x 270
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2012·No. Nos. 12-7846, 12-7848·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Simmons appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion to alter or amend the court’s order awarding the Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Vickers, No. 1:09-cv00653-TLW; Simmons v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:09-cv-00858-TLW, 2012 WL 4761432 (D.S.C. Oct. 3; Oct. 2 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons v. Vickers, 502 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2012).

502 F. App'x 270 (Simmons v. Vickers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related