Simmons v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Simmons v. United States

300 F. 321, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 668, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3023

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJuly 2, 1924

DocketNo. 4015

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 300 F. 321 (Simmons v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons v. United States, 300 F. 321, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 668, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3023 (6th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

DENISON, C. J.

Epitomized Opinion

Dr. Simimons, a practicing physician of Nashville, Tenn., was convicted of furnishing morphine in violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. 6287g-6287q). It appeared that during nine months he had given to 108 persons, all of whom were morphine addicts, a total of 4,095 prescriptions, calling for 79,592 grains of morphine. It was his custom to recognize 8 grains per day as a maximum, and to give prescriptions intended to cover this supply for a period of six days. In affirming the conviction, the Court of Appeals held:

1. Where, in nine months, defendant, a physician, gave 108 persons 4,095 prescriptions, calling for 79,592 grains of morphine, his volume of business conclusively shows his intent, and defense of entrapment need not be seriously considered.

2. Where defendant was plainly guilty, a conviction will not be set aside, even if there were errors which would require a reversal in a doubtful case.

3. In a prosecution under the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. 6287g-6287q), that prescriptions were given to addict, who was in pay of government, acting as a detective, held not to show forbidden entrapment.

4. That physician required his patients to produce a certificate that they were afflicted with incurable diseases, as required by Acts Tenn. 1919, c. 105, and regulations thereunder, held not to constitute exculpatory good faith, within Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. 6287g-6287q), as state law conflicts with federal act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENISON, C. J.

Epitomized Opinion

Dr. Simimons, a practicing physician of Nashville, Tenn., was convicted of furnishing morphine in violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. 6287g-6287q). It appeared that during nine months he had given to 108 persons, all of whom were morphine addicts, a total of 4,095 prescriptions, calling for 79,592 grains of morphine. It was his custom to recognize 8 grains per day as a maximum, and to give prescriptions intended to cover this supply for a period of six days. In affirming the conviction, the Court of Appeals held:

1. Where, in nine months, defendant, a physician, gave 108 persons 4,095 prescriptions, calling for 79,592 grains of morphine, his volume of business conclusively shows his intent, and defense of entrapment need not be seriously considered.

2. Where defendant was plainly guilty, a conviction will not be set aside, even if there were errors which would require a reversal in a doubtful case.

3. In a prosecution under the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. 6287g-6287q), that prescriptions were given to addict, who was in pay of government, acting as a detective, held not to show forbidden entrapment.

4. That physician required his patients to produce a certificate that they were afflicted with incurable diseases, as required by Acts Tenn. 1919, c. 105, and regulations thereunder, held not to constitute exculpatory good faith, within Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. 6287g-6287q), as state law conflicts with federal act.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 F. 321, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 668, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-united-states-ca6-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack