Simmons v. Together Credit Union
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
ALLEN SIMMONS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:24-cv-00084-MTS ) TOGETHER CREDIT UNION, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Entry of Default. Doc. [22]; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c). The Court has reviewed Defendant’s Motion and Plaintiff’s Response thereto. The Court concludes that there was no bad faith present in the default, that Defendant has presented meritorious defenses, and that there is an absence of prejudice shown. See Johnson v. Dayton Elec. Mfg. Co., 140 F.3d 781, 784 (8th Cir. 1998) (setting forth factors court considers in determining whether to set aside entry of default). Given those factors and recognizing that there is a “judicial preference for adjudication on the merits,” the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion. See Oberstar v. F.D.I.C., 987 F.2d 494, 504 (8th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Entry of Default, Doc. [22], is GRANTED, and the Clerk’s Entry of Default is SET ASIDE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file its responsive pleading no later than Tuesday, October 01, 2024. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, Doc. [17], is DENIED. Dated this 17th day of September 2024. Th fy T. SCHELP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simmons v. Together Credit Union (Simmons v. Together Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.