Simmons v. Textron, Inc.
This text of Simmons v. Textron, Inc. (Simmons v. Textron, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ ) CHARLES SIMMONS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-cv-1077 (APM) ) TEXTRON, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )
ORDER
Upon review of the parties’ papers, the court denies without prejudice the Textron
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, ECF No. 8, and will grant
Plaintiff a 60-day period in which to conduct limited jurisdictional discovery. See GTE New Media
Servs. Inc. v. BellSouth Corp., 199 F.3d 1343, 1351 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (holding that “if a party
demonstrates that it can supplement its jurisdictional allegations through discovery, then
jurisdictional discovery is justified”). To survive a follow-on motion to dismiss, such discovery
will have to satisfy not only the D.C. long-arm statute but establish that the exercise of personal
jurisdiction is consistent with due process. Meeting the latter condition will require Plaintiff to
establish, at least based on the present limited record, that the Textron Defendants “deliberately
extended” their business into the District of Columbia or “systematically served” this market. Ford
Motor Co. v. Mont. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. 141 S. Ct. 1017, 1027, 1028 (2021). “Isolated or sporadic
transactions” will not do. Id. at 1028 n.4. Among the relevant factors the court will be required
to consider include whether the Textron Defendants routinely sell or lease their Minute Miser
vehicle (and perhaps related products) in the District of Columbia; advertise such products here; and service such products here. See id. at 1028 (observing that Ford “had advertised, sold, and
serviced” its cars in the relevant states “for many years”).
The court will enter a separate order governing jurisdictional discovery.
Dated: January 14, 2022 Amit P. Mehta United States District Court Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Simmons v. Textron, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-textron-inc-dcd-2022.