Simmons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Simmons v. State

1914 OK CR 215, 285 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 393, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 114

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 27, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 215 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons v. State, 1914 OK CR 215, 285 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 393, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 114 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER GURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted and convicted upon an information which charged that he did unlawfully deal, carry on, open and conduct as owner, a certain game of roulette. In accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was by the court on the 25th day of November, 1912, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for. 30 days and to pay a fine of $300. Numerous errors are assigned. Without entering into a discussion of the same, we will state that from our examination of the record, they are without merit. The information is sufficient, and the evidence of the state as" to the guilt of the defendant is undisputed. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER GURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted and convicted upon an information which charged that he did unlawfully deal, carry on, open and conduct as owner, a certain game of roulette. In accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was by the court on the 25th day of November, 1912, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for. 30 days and to pay a fine of $300. Numerous errors are assigned. Without entering into a discussion of the same, we will state that from our examination of the record, they are without merit. The information is sufficient, and the evidence of the state as" to the guilt of the defendant is undisputed. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 215, 285 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 393, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.