Simmons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Simmons v. State

359 S.W.3d 539, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2012 WL 548996

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 2012

DocketED 96289

StatusPublished

This text of 359 S.W.3d 539 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons v. State, 359 S.W.3d 539, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2012 WL 548996 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Simmons appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Simmons’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedéntial value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Simmons appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Simmons’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedéntial value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 S.W.3d 539, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2012 WL 548996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack