Simmons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Simmons v. State

331 S.W.3d 677, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 2011 WL 92732

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2011·No. No. ED 94951·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Simmons appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion to re-open rule 29.15 proceedings. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Simmons appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion to re-open rule 29.15 proceedings. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Simmons v. State, 331 S.W.3d 677, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 2011 WL 92732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

331 S.W.3d 677 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.