Simmons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Simmons v. State

323 S.W.3d 82, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1372, 2010 WL 3971440

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 12, 2010

DocketED 94210

StatusPublished

This text of 323 S.W.3d 82 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons v. State, 323 S.W.3d 82, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1372, 2010 WL 3971440 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Leroy Simmons, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Leroy Simmons, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

323 S.W.3d 82, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1372, 2010 WL 3971440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack