Simmons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Simmons v. State

817 S.W.2d 602, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392, 1991 WL 179435

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simmons v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1698 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 17, 1991·No. No. 59671·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Simmons v. State, 817 S.W.2d 602, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392, 1991 WL 179435 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

817 S.W.2d 602 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.